Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Compare pricing, context windows and capabilities from OpenRouter. Open either model’s page to check availability and try it online.

deepseekDeepSeek V4.1 Flashnewdeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flashxiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Pronewxiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro

Input price /M$0.301.5× cheaper$0.435

Output price /M$1.20$0.871.4× cheaper

Cache read /M$0.0060$0.00361.7× cheaper

Context window1M1M

Catalog date10 Sept 202621 Sept 2026

What the same turn costs

Estimates from published token rates — stated token counts, not measurements.

Quick answer2K tokens in, 600 outDeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0013MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.0014

10-slide deck build60K tokens in, 9K outDeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0291.2× cheaperMiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.034

150-page PDF read200K tokens in, 4K outDeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0651.4× cheaperMiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.09

Capabilities

Bothtool-usevisionreasoning

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: text, image → text · MiMo-V2.6-Pro: text, image, video, audio → text

Which model should you use?

Start with the token cost for your workload, the context you need, and supported input types. A lower price or larger context window does not establish better answer quality.

To compare answers, open each model in a separate chat and use the same prompt. Token tables use published specs and estimates; any measured AA results above are a separate benchmark.

Try DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — pricing and availability Try MiMo-V2.6-Pro — pricing and availability