OpenCraft

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Input price /M$0.143.1× cheaper$0.435
Output price /M$0.283.1× cheaper$0.87
Cache read /M$0.00281.3× cheaper$0.0036
Context window1M1M
Catalog date21 Sept 202621 Sept 2026

What the same turn costs

Estimates from published token rates — stated token counts, not measurements.

Quick answer2K tokens in, 600 outMiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.00043.1× cheaperMiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.0014
10-slide deck build60K tokens in, 9K outMiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0113.1× cheaperMiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.034
150-page PDF read200K tokens in, 4K outMiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0293.1× cheaperMiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.09

Capabilities

Bothtool-usevisionreasoning

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: text, image, video, audio → text · MiMo-V2.6-Pro: text, image, video, audio → text

Which model should you use?

Start with the token cost for your workload, the context you need, and supported input types. A lower price or larger context window does not establish better answer quality.

To compare answers, open each model in a separate chat and use the same prompt. Token tables use published specs and estimates; any measured AA results above are a separate benchmark.

Try MiMo-V2.6-Flash — pricing and availabilityTry MiMo-V2.6-Pro — pricing and availability